The left’s war against language, thought, and liberty

Ho-hum. Another day, another rational debate slaughtered by screeches of “racism.”

And more evidence that MSNBC’s Chris Matthew and his guests will always faithfully and thoroughly examine all sides of an issue before choosing which word best applies: “Racist,” “xenophobic,” “islamophobic,” or “homophobic.”

Take this weekend’s exchange between Matthews and Pulitzer Prize winning columnist, Cynthia Tucker (courtesy of Newsbusters):

With the opening segment of the syndicated program “The Chris Matthews Show” focusing on the strong position the GOP has going into the midterm elections, Tucker said, “We haven’t talked about the elephant in the room, and I don’t mean the Republicans: race. Changing demographics. Fear of a white minority.”

She disgustingly continued as host Chris Matthews agreed, “Obama’s election has suddenly made many white Americans aware of the loss of a white majority. That’s what this crazy summer has been all about”

Bruce Walker has a meaty piece in American Thinker that explains what is really going on here: Diligent, left-wing busy beavers are damming the flow of language in order to fill their own reservoir of power.

It’s nothing new; liberty is always under threat from those who want to run our lives. This time, as Walker points out, the battle is being fought through words; casting this generation of aggressors more in the image of Elmer Gantry than Julius Caesar. That requires a smooth-talker, because language must be taken hostage before liberty can follow

The enslavement of minds comes from the abolition of language and its reconstruction into small jail cells which prevent the subjects of Oceania from thinking, a process dependent upon words. That is why so many leftists flock to journalism, teaching, law, colleges, and politics — choice points in human cognition which, if controlled by Party members, let language itself be enslaved. When we let leftists (or, as I would call them, Sinisterists) limit and control the words we use to think, then no matter what victories for freedom we believe that we have won, our hands and feet are still fettered. 

It wouldn’t be the first time. History is rife with accounts of oppressed peoples pursuing the phony deliverance of leering, silver-tongued demons into earthly hells. But this isn’t 1917 Russia or 1789 France. A pampered populace must be agitated and manipulated into imaginary victim status before they will exchange their liberty for equally imaginary rescue. That requires a skillful embargo of language and selective rationing of information to the masses. Walker:

How utterly dependent are our enemies on the quackery of an ideological spectrum with all its sundry, silly words? When is the last time that someone like Howard Dean or Harry Reid could engage in political debate without falling into a groove which kept repeating “far right,” “extremist,” or some similar slanderous sloganeering devoid of any real meaning? When a Tea Party supporter suggests a return of power to state governments, do our enemies ever — really, ever? — respond respectfully and rationally? The first and the last argument comprises personal attacks, crude insults rooted in the phony ideological spectrum, and use of words intended to end thinking rather than produce serious discussion. 

Walker points out that the aggression is focused on several much-maligned arteries of our freedom, which can be easily identified by ever-present swarms of heckling leftists brandishing semantic tourniquets.

…They hate Judeo-Christian religious belief because they hate divinely ordained liberty. The confluence of these rages always leads to the same cesspool: Sinisterists hate America (its liberty and its faithful people), hate Israel (that island of liberty and hope created by people bound to stubborn notions of purpose), hate Christians (the principal liberators of mankind), and Jews (the unbreakable bearers of original moral values). 

Will they succeed? Maybe. While centuries of patriots have selflessly poured out their “life liberty and sacred honor” to secure freedom for generations, many of our contemporaries detest that legacy because it thwarts their ability to boss us around. But they know that they can’t wrest that precious inheritance away by force. It must be voluntarily placed into their hands.

Related posts at Scared Monkeys, and Enduring Sense. 

UPDATE: I corrected a duplicated block quote.

Read full storyComments { 0 }

America Rising – November 2, 2010

Read full storyComments { 0 }

Here we go again: Hillary for President 2012 television ads

This is intriguing and horrifying at the same time. Not that it wouldn’t be vastly entertaining to watch Obama’s re-election bid fizzle in the primaries. But I’d rather forego that pleasure than risk Hillary and The Creep taking up residence in the White House ever again.

Besides, it would be uncharitable not to let Obama preserve his one triumph: That he was the one to knock smug, entitled Hillary off her high horse and rescue America from a chief executive that curdles milk with a dirty look. Come to think of it, wasn’t that what got him the Nobel Peace Prize?

And then there’s Bill. Obama might be a self-satisfied, incompetent Marxist, but expectations tend to decrease when you’ve had a drooling perv in the Oval Office for eight years. You find yourself applauding the little things: As in, ”So he just flushed a trillion down the toilet – at least he doesn’t expose himself to unsuspecting women and then enlist the First Lady to pre-emptively destroy their credibility and reputations.”

So, despite everything, Obama’s redeeming quality remains that he’s not Hillary, which reminds me of a hilarious Matt Labash piece from the Weekly Standard during the 2008 campaign. Like all superb humor, it was spot on — especially the final paragraphs:

I’ve always regarded Obama as a bit slight for the hype, a garnish in search of an entrée, a moment in search of momentousness. But attacking him for the slavish support his charisma inspires seems a bit unfair. It would be like faulting Hillary Clinton for her best qualities–like her rapier wit, slender ankles, and personal warmth.

Plus, I do support Obama on the issue. Not issues, mind you. I’m against almost everything he stands for; including hope and change (I’m for despair and preserving the status quo). But he’s for standing over the rotting carcass of Hillary’s political ambitions, and so am I! Some might call it venal small-mindedness. But Obama and I call it “post-partisanship.” For Hillary is the one we’ve been waiting for. To go away.

More at All-American Blogger and Michelle Malkin.

Read full storyComments { 4 }

Code Pink street theater: The pain that terrorists endure when their victims defend themselves

You won’t want to miss this. Code Pink has debuted its “Peace Charade” theater, protesting the upcoming peace talks and Israel’s stubborn unwillingness to let Hamas kill them.  

peoplescube.com

 

Doug Powers says:    

Either this is Code Pink trying to re-enact the peace negotiations in front of the White House, or it’s “role-play therapy” day at the Cuckoo’s Nest. In either case, an intervention with a fire hose and anti-psychotic drugs is in order. 

Typical leftists. When the truth interferes with your propaganda campaign, just contrive a scripted alternate reality. Take the idea out of the realm of street theater, and you have Crash the Tea Party.

Not that this doesn’t have all the charm of a Busby Berkeley musical, but there were a few gaps in the casting. Couldn’t they find any rocket-launching, Jew-killing terrorists to cower behind those pitiful Gazan shields, I mean women?  

Don’t get me wrong. I sympathize with the women of Gaza. Particularly when clueless American Marxist busybodies pillage symbols of their torment solely to aid and abet their tormentors.     

Honestly, those harpies would protest the bars around Hannibal Lecter if he only cannibalized Jews.     

More about Code Pink’s true level of concern for oppressed women here and here.

Read full storyComments { 1 }

Hawking: The universe created itself from nothing because of all the gravity and stuff that was there before

 

Move over, Nietzsche. World’s-greatest-physicist Stephen Hawking’s latest book The Grand Design, has “settle[d] the God question once and for all.” At least that’s how one blogger headlined it.

Full disclosure: I hate science and it hates me. Really. In that long-ago, uninspired, and nearly-forgotten stage of my life called “school,” I took science. I think. At least I remember doing unpleasant and smelly things because sadistic adults made me.

On the other hand, Hawking just retired from the same position at Cambridge University held by Isaac Newton. It’s really amazing that we even belong to the same species.

That’s why I feel ridiculous writing this, but then that’s never stopped me before. So here goes: Am I the only one that finds his statement a little, well, ridiculous? Contradictory? Dare I say, illogical?

He wrote:

“Because there is a law such as gravity, the Universe can and will create itself from nothing,” the excerpt says. “Spontaneous creation is the reason there is something rather than nothing, why the Universe exists, why we exist. It is not necessary to invoke God to … set the Universe going.”

Huh? I gotta be missing something here. Is he saying that the existence of gravity created the conditions that made the universe the first thing to exist? Hmmmm. That makes me want to knit my Neanderthalish beetle-brow and scratch my head.

But then what do I know compared to this intellectual descendant of Newton; who, incidentally, said, “This most beautiful system (The Universe) could only proceed from the dominion of an intelligent and powerful Being.”

He must have been referring to something like this:

Read full storyComments { 2 }

White House suppresses evidence that abstinence education unites parents and teens

My latest post on Newsreal.

A recent study has found that abstinence education revitalizes the role of Mom and Dad in shaping the values of our youth – but the Obama Administration doesn’t want you to know about it.

The Administration for Children and Families (ACF), a division of HHS, funded a survey of 1,000 adolescents between the ages of 12 and 18 and their parents, in order to measure parent-adolescent communication and adolescent attitudes toward sex and abstinence.

The American Public Health Association’s (APHA) website reveals the results of the study:

“Adjusting for all other factors in the model, parent and peer factors are more consistently associated with differences in adolescent attitudes about sex and abstinence than are measures of adolescent exposure to sex and abstinence topics in a class or program. 

Unfortunately, administration officials have decided to sit on the pro-family data, withholding valuable, taxpayer-funded insights from behavioral scientists who could put it to good use.  

Researcher Lisa Rue, Ph.D., a specialist in adolescent behavior, wrote an editorial in the Times Call revealing that the HHS had blocked her repeated requests for the full detailed study, including a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request.

[…]

Rue suspected the full details were being withheld because they would undermine the Obama administration’s priorities on sex education, which do not include sexual abstinence or address the issue of fatherlessness in children’s lives.
Rue concluded, “At this point in time, we must ask ourselves: Is this valuable process being suppressed by those who wish to repress American values in an effort to exert control over sex education offered in the United States?” 

I guess it’s too much to hope that the most pro-abortion president in history would celebrate a program proven unite mothers and daughters in shared values. Especially considering that a plethora of other statistics supporting abstinence education didn’t prevent him from cutting the program’s funding, effectively ending it next month.

But then it’s been clear for decades that ideology, not statistics, dictate how leftists prefer to mold young minds. Because if stats were heeded, the notion of encouraging values-free, consequence-free, it’s-us-against-your-parents teen sex would be remembered only as a colossal sixties-era blunder; because the infant program would have been summarily scrapped when teen pregnancy and venereal disease skyrocketed within years of its inception.

Instead, we now have rosy-cheeked adolescents filling prescriptions for Ortho-Novum and Valtrex at the same stage of life that their grandmothers got their first lipstick – the last generation to grow up blissfully unaware of such things as pelvic inflammatory disease and genital warts.

That innocence was stolen from her descendents – perhaps most egregiously since greedy adults learned they could prosper from sexualizing youth. And this latest study adds to a stack of evidence that abstinence education can minimize the theft and perversion of their childhoods.

Which makes me wonder why the Obama Administration wants to hide it.

Read full storyComments { 0 }

Inter-faith “reconciliation” at Ground Zero: A sincerity test for Imam Rauf

 

A New York City community leader has an interesting (albeit naïve) idea that’s never going to happen, but it could spark some illuminating dialogue in the Ground Zero Mosque controversy.

Julie Menin, chair of the city’s community board has suggested that the embattled $100 million, 13-story Islamic “cultural center” be “transformed into an inter-faith center for reconciliation… to be shared by Muslims, Christians and Jews.”

That should go over just fine with the Ground Zero Mosque Imam Faisal Abdul Rauf, since he has already announced to the world that he considers himself “a Jew.” A declaration that liberal journalists like Jeffrey Goldberg tout as proof that a Ground Zero monument to Islam is motivated by nothing but generous impulses of kindness, unity, and goodwill.

The right-wing campaign against the so-called “Ground Zero mosque” includes vicious personal attacks on the Muslim cleric who leads the Cordoba Initiative, the organization behind the plan. I know Imam Faisal Abdul Rauf, and I know him to be a moderate, forward-leaning Muslim — yes, it is true he has said things with which I disagree, but I have never expected him to function as a member of the Zionist Organization of America.

In 2003, Imam Rauf was invited to speak at a memorial service for Daniel Pearl, the journalist murdered by Islamist terrorists in Pakistan. The service was held at B’nai Jeshurun, a prominent synagogue in Manhattan, and in the audience was Judea Pearl, Daniel Pearl’s father. In his remarks, Rauf identified absolutely with Pearl, and identified himself absolutely with the ethical tradition of Judaism. “I am a Jew,” he said.

Jeffrey, if you read this, call me. I know a guy who can get you a really good deal on an oil rig in the Gulf of Mexico. This is a well-known ancient Islamist mind trick. Ever since Mohammed conquered Mecca after lying them into complacency with a ten-year peace treaty, it has been Islamic tradition to sweet-talk adversaries until they can be subdued in a more conventional manner.

That’s why it’s amusing that Menin’s suggestion essentially challenges Rauf to put his money where his mouth is. Not that it would sway those like Goldberg, who are so completely lulled by tranquilizing words that they can’t fathom what ecumenical, unifying “I am a Jew” Rauf is actually asking of New Yorkers: That the same words that echoed through the cabin of UA175 while office workers were leaping from the North Tower inferno, “Allahu Akbar,” will echo over the asphalt that received those souls five times a day for perpetuity.

That is a lot of ask — not just because it opens wounds; but because, face it, there is no guarantee that more hatred wouldn’t fester within those walls. It’s common knowledge that prodigious anti-American fury seethes within many mosques. Americans are rightly concerned that an Islamic center at Ground Zero could be a magnet for Islamist fanatics of the sort that even Goldberg acknowledged would murder Rauf for consorting with Jews.  

Nevertheless, a traumatized populace, already spooked by the project’s dedication to Cordoba and the organizers’ irrational insistence that no other location would suit them, are being asked to trust the word of a man who is either a cunning, manipulative liar or suffers from multiple personality disorder.  

Useful infidels, like Goldberg, only see Fuzzy Rauf – a man the New York Times says “talks reconciliation between America and Middle Eastern Muslims” in “soft, almost New Agey” tones. Fuzzy Rauf praises our system, calls the U.S. Shariah “compliant,” and compares that vicious Islamic straitjacket to our Constitutional form of government. (Oddly his cheerleaders in the mainstream media, like Goldberg, never seem to find that strange.) All that matters is that Fuzzy Rauf sounds soothing, inclusive, tolerant, and says things like, “From our experience multiple religious voices praying together can serve our deepest common good.”

But then there is Scary Rauf, who sheds all pretense when speaking Arabic and declares that he “doesn’t believe in religious dialogue.” Scary Rauf feels the 9/11 attacks were justified, refuses to repudiate Hamas, and discusses the necessity of establishing an “Islamic state… through a “kingdom or democracy.”

“The important issue is to establish the general fundamentals of Sharia that are required to govern. It is known that there are sets of standards that are accepted by [Muslim] scholars to organize the relationships between government and the governed.”

Translation of Scary Rauf’s Arabic rants are available if Goldberg is interested. But, he’s not, because he’s too busy falling for the oldest con job in the book.

Nevertheless, Goldberg’s glowing tribute to Rauf’s courageous ecumenical impulses includes a fairly harsh indictment of his machete-wielding faith partners.

There are those who would argue that these represent mere words, chosen carefully to appease a potentially suspicious audience. I would argue something different: That any Muslim imam who stands before a Jewish congregation and says, “I am a Jew,” is placing his life in danger. Remember, Islamists hate the people they consider apostates even more than they hate Christians and Jews. In other words, the man many commentators on the right assert is a terrorist-sympathizer placed himself in mortal peril in order to identify himself with Christians and Jews, and specifically with the most famous Jewish victim of Islamism.

So off-hand. So casual. Say “I’m a Jew,” and off with your head. And yet Goldberg still doesn’t get why New Yorkers are skittish about these guys setting up shop at Ground Zero. Could you imagine anyone in your church fearing for his life after stating, rhetorically, “I am a Jew?” And yet Goldberg presumes that level of retaliation from Muslims. It makes it seem a teensy bit unfair that all of his frowns and scolds are reserved for “right-wing” Americans and their “vicious” albeit machete-free “personal attacks.”

Wake up Jeffrey! I strongly suspect that Rauf isn’t in danger of losing his head over all that “I am a Jew” claptrap.  Like a good Muslim, he had his fingers prominently crossed for all his brethren to see.

If Rauf agrees to Menin’s “inter-faith center for reconciliation,” I will admit I was wrong. But, even then, I think we should pay attention when he starts speaking Arabic.

Read full storyComments { 6 }

Overcoming dishonor

One day after hundreds of thousands gathered beneath the long shadows of Abraham Lincoln and Martin Luther King at the National Mall and resolved to restore America’s honor, Dr. Zero  points out that the restoration journey will only succeed if we rebuke those things that dishonor us.

I have excerpted his closing paragraphs below, but it is all a must-read. You can find it here.

We have listened too long to the poisonous whispers of those who say we’re too old and feeble to stand up and deal with our own problems. The doom they have written for us can be swept aside like so many cobwebs. Honorable people do not fear risk and challenge. We dishonor ourselves by believing we have no moral claim on the entirety of our labor, or responsibility for the maintenance of our needs. We dishonor ourselves by paying trillions to hear the same old fairy tale about limitless entitlements distributed by friendly giants wearing power ties. The American people have wasted enough time reading the elaborate limited warranty on the inside of the coffin lid our Left is preparing to nail shut.

We reclaim our honor by turning away from those who believe the great mass of us are beneath their contempt, and compassion is best expressed through domination. They have no power we didn’t give them, which means they have no power we cannot take away. Let us begin.

Read full storyComments Off

The inexorable spread of despair

H/T The Truth.  It’s chilling to watch economic darkness advance across the map like a medieval epidemic – a graphic representation of an economy most definitely not stimulated by President Obama’s  wasteful and expensive snake oil. When will the clowns in Washington wake up and realize that they are putting the brakes on economic growth by interfering in the private sector, distorting the forces of the marketplace, and spooking investors with impending tax hikes. Hopefully we can hold out until someone is in charge who isn’t afraid to open the throttle by letting the producers among us keep the fruits of their ingenuity for a change.

Read full storyComments Off

A picture lesson: U.S. elections have repercussions far beyond our own borders

I saw this at Gateway Pundit and had to share it. Iran, before and after foreign policy genius, Jimmy Carter, ditched the Shah and sent a sane, westernized nation hurtling backward a thousand years into the psychotic hands of the Ayatollah and his mad mullahs.

Womanhood in Iran during the 1970’s:

 Womanhood in Iran today:

Carter never met a totalitarian thug he didn’t coddle. (Unless they were interfering with bigger tyrants.) Remember how the Soviets exploited his incompetence by gobbling up Africa and South America?

Luckily, that didn’t last long. We came to our senses and replaced Carter with communism’s worst nightmare. Ronald Reagan was the anti-Carter, and he knew how to deal with Moscow’s aggression. But unfortunately, 35 years later, the final scenes have yet to be written in Iran.

Anyway, we have someone in the White House right now, reprising Carter’s role. We better start praying in earnest for another Reagan to clean up the mess.

To be fair, the Carter years weren’t all bad. Look what he did for the economy.

Read full storyComments Off

Stop illegal aliens from voting – draft them into the military

Something new for the 2010 election: Apparently states will be in violation of federal law if they don’t allow plenty of time to get absentee ballots to those who can’t be home on Election Day because of prior commitments with crazed jihadists.  

The strangest phrase in the previous paragraph is “will be.” At least it is to me. Isn’t it strange that states are only just now in violation of the law if they can’t bestir themselves to make sure those who are sent overseas to guard our freedom are allowed to vote?  Only now?

But it gets better.  Apparently ten states have told the feds that getting ballots to the soldiers 45 days before the election would be too difficult, and have applied for waivers — five of which were granted.

J. Christian Adams:

I have written previously here at PJM that all waiver requests should be denied. Unfortunately, if you are an overseas service member from Delaware, Massachusetts, New York, Rhode Island, or Washington, the protections in the MOVE Act aren’t going to apply to you this year. And if you are from one of the states who still aren’t in compliance with MOVE — like Colorado, Wisconsin, or Alaska — don’t be surprised if you get scant help from Attorney General Eric Holder.

Waivers can be granted from MOVE only if states find a way to make sure the votes of service members are still counted.

Washington, despite having plenty of time after an August 17 primary to get the job done, received a waiver today. Washington was unwilling to change their schedule of ballot preparation to allow for 45 days mailing time. Though modern printing technology makes the Washington waiver unnecessary, it was granted.

In related news, while some of our deployed military are being told that their chance to vote still isn’t guaranteed, the Department of Homeland Security is going to bat for an illegal immigrant who fraudulently voted in past U.S elections. Incredibly, federal officials are asking the Putnam County, Tennessee, administrator of elections to purge the serial lawbreaker’s name from the 2004 voting records, because that pesky little detail is tripping up their plan to turn him into a real U.S. citizen.

Not only that, but the unidentified illegal immigrant used a fraudulent social security number and false ID when he registered to vote in 2004. And his vote canceled out one legitimate vote, violating the constitutional rights of a legal citizen.

All minor details, however, to the feds. Little annoyances that need to be taken care of before he raises his right hand and swears: “… I will support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same…” 

I’m surprised he was even asked to show ID. Isn’t that racist? But I digress. So, Illegal aliens can steal votes and identities and then be rewarded with citizenship. I guess this means our military personnel are risking their lives in a desert hell-hole not only to protect our right to vote legitimately but some foreigner’s ability to vote fraudulently as well. Not that they’re given a choice regarding the latter.

But the true travesty is that it is so easy for non-Americans to influence our policy through the ballot-box, while that same right is still in limbo for many of our military personnel. Their ability to vote should never be in question — even for one second. It should be every state’s highest priority.

Update:  Ed Morrissey at Hot Air points out that noncompliance with MOVE, and a corresponding suppression of military absentee ballots, could swing election results in four states. However, he points out that there doesn’t seem to be any penalties for noncompliance, stating that “military voters are the only ones penalized.” Pathetic.

Read full storyComments { 2 }

Count Dracula has the vote in Rhode Island, but overseas military still iffy

 

Rhode Island was one of five states granted a waiver from the Military and Overseas Voter Empowerment Act (MOVE), a new federal law that requires absentee ballots be mailed out to deployed military at least 45 days prior to an election. That caught my eye because while Rhode Island officials feel that ensuring the voting rights of overseas military poses an undue hardship, they are making sure that a mental patient who thinks he is Count Dracula and Rudy Valentino will have his views represented on Election Day.

According to the Election Law Center, “Patients in Rhode Island’s state psychiatric hospital will be allowed to vote in the November election despite signing voter registration forms as ‘Count Dracula’ and ‘Rudy Valentino.’”

The Providence Journal:

Vanessa E. Volz, a lawyer with the Rhode Island Disability Law Center who had notarized all 32 forms, told the three-man Board of Canvassers Thursday that she had conducted a patient training session on voter rights at the hospital and returned days later with voting forms.

On Aug. 5, the day in question, according to the notarized forms, Volz said she sat at a table in the hospital’s Day Room, a community room where patients gather to watch television and socialize, and patients interested in voting “came over.”

“I asked the questions and I filled them out,” Volz said of the mail-ballot applications, confirming why all the forms showed the same handwriting.

In the same article, the Journal stated that the Rhode Island elections officials had upheld the right to vote of two men who had been found not guilty of murder by reason of insanity.

Meanwhile, the brave Rhode Island residents serving our country overseas have their fingers crossed that they will be able to vote, too.

Read full storyComments Off
5 visitors online now
5 guests, 0 members
Max visitors today: 47 at 12:53 pm PDT
This month: 47 at 09-06-2010 12:53 pm PDT
This year: 65 at 06-23-2010 07:49 pm PDT
All time: 65 at 06-23-2010 07:49 pm PDT